Sunday, October 9, 2011

The Lessons and Consistency of Frost


                Many poets at some point in their career attempt to define what it is they do – poetry. These definitions often include lofty aspirations of what (or who) a poet is, the work that poetry should do in society, and the place poetry should hold for both the poet and others. Robert Frost like the many poets that came before and after him set out his thoughts on poetry in his work The Figure a Poem Makes.
                In The Figure a Poem Makes, Frost asserts that poetry “must be a revelation, or a series of revelations, as much for the poet as for the reader” (1410*). Frost believes that poetry should cause a revelation in the poet as well as the reader – we should be learning from poetry. Frost describes this phenomenon differently earlier in the passage: “the surprise of remembering something I didn’t know I knew” (1410).  Writing poetry taught Frost lessons that he must have known on some level, but was not consciously aware of or acting on.  Poetry should change us and our perspectives on our situations, whether we write it or read it. After I read Frost’s beliefs about the work of poetry I went back through some of his poetry and tried to find the ‘revelation’ in the poem – what I can learn from this, and maybe even what Frost learned from his poems.  Additionally, I wanted to see if Frost often followed his own guidelines for poetry. The consistency of what a poet believes poetry should be and what their writing actually entails is often interesting and very telling about that particular poet.
                Frost’s The Road Not Taken is one of his most popular poems, and well-known American poems, in general. The poem begins with Frost describing the intersection of paths in the woods. Shortly thereafter, the wooden paths become metaphorical rather than simply paths.  The way the two paths are described makes them seem as though each would be a fine choice, but yet a choice had to be made. Frost was reflecting on how he got to where he is in life, and what has made him who he is.  Frost at that point chose “the one less traveled by;” it was that “path” or choice in Frost’s life “that has made all the difference” in who he became.  The riskier choices Frost made in his life were the ones that made “all the difference.” ‘Playing it safe,’ always choosing the safest option is not the way to live life. Frost did not regret his risks, at least not in hindsight, and as a young person I should not be afraid to take risks, and make choices that no one else is. Frost’s sentiment and revelation in this poem reminds all of us, Frost included, that following the crowd does not always pay off – we need to think and choose for ourselves.
                The destruction of the world is discussed in Fire and Ice.  Frost debates whether the world will end in fire or ice. He ultimately resolves that it does not matter whether the world is destroyed by fire or ice, because destruction is final. However, the world ends up being destroyed will “suffice.” Frost comes to the revelation that either fire or ice would adequately destroy the world. This revelation should cause us to stop worrying about how the world will end and instead we should focus on living our lives while the world still does exist.  Much like the previously discussed The Road Not Traveled, risks are worth taking, and we should not worry about destruction, but rather the life that we are living.
                Frost’s Nothing Gold Can Stay discusses the fleeting quality of beauty and perfection.  The poem moves from the initial perfection of nature’s “first green” to the Garden of Eden, the perfection of both could not last.  Frost ends the poem with its title “nothing gold can stay,” which is also the revelation within the poem. Perfection does not last, this side of heaven, and we should cherish the perfect hues of nature, and special moments while they last.   
                Frost’s Mending Wall describes a yearly New England tradition of mending the wall between neighbors. The first line of the poem “Something there is that doesn’t love a wall”, which is also repeated near the end at line 35, begins to hint at the revelation of the poem. The only other repeated line in the poem is explanation of this tradition by the speaker’s neighbor “Good fences make good neighbors.” It seems as though the speaker is the first one to question the practice of mending and rebuilding the wall every year. The speaker would rather let the wall crumble, but is not willing to explain this to the neighbor, rather the speaker fixes the wall  and wonders what it is that causes the wall to fall. Simple physics would tell the speaker that the ground freezing and thawing causes the wall to fall, but this simple answer does not seem to be what the speaker is really looking to find. Instead, the speaker is doing something relatively radical even by our standards – questioning ingrained tradition. Frost’s revelation is that tradition is important, but it should also be logical. If ‘something’ is continually destroying the fence, maybe the neighbors should become friends rather than continually building a wall to ignore each other. It is rather ironic that the neighbors work to build a wall between themselves all the while the speaker is wondering about the neighbor and the neighbor’s thoughts, rather than asking. Questioning traditions may bring change, but that change could also bring friendship and unity.
                Frost relatively clearly lays out what poetry is and who a poet is in his The Figure a Poem Makes. One of Frost’s main points about poetry is that it should have a revelation that can teach both the poet and the reader. Poetry is a method of teaching and learning lessons. In the four poems that I evaluated and analyzed (although I may have purposely chosen them that way), Frost completed his mission of revelation in poetry by including lessons for the reader, and likely for himself. In all fairness, we cannot be certain that Frost did learn from his own poetry.  Not every poet is able to actually fulfill what they believe poetry is in their own writing. Frost was a good poet being able to coherently describe what poetry is as well as practice it in his own writing.

* All page numbers from Norton Anthology of American Literature Seventh Edition. 

2 comments:

  1. Nice job in describing Frost's poems. I think you really showed the authentic simplicity in Frost's writings. He often used metaphors that most people could understand and apply to their own lives. In a way they could parallel the parables of Jesus in their straightforwardness and practical application.

    I think it is safe to say, however, that Frost did learn from his poetry. I feel that he wouldn't have written about what poetry is and who a poet is unless he himself was well educated in that area. He must have had justifiable grounds to write that poem. His success and longevity confirm that he knew what he was doing.

    ReplyDelete
  2. It really makes me wonder what exactly he was learning as he wrote... It seems like he expects a certain subjectivity of interpretation on all sides and writes accordingly - not to mention his attitude was far more individualistic than say Spencer who would've considered poetry's use to society and humanity as a whole. He starts with a subject, concerns himself with using language well while discussing it, and then through that the lessons start to come... and they come for each of us, they're not necessarily meant for a "society"

    Thanks for sharing Cyndi - it'll be really interesting to start bringing some of this up in class.

    ReplyDelete