What really surprised me when reading the biography of Zora Neale Hurston was that she “quarreled especially with Langston Hughes; she rejected the idea that a black writer’s chief concern should be how blacks were being portrayed to the white reader.” The biography goes on to say that Hurston felt she didn’t have to uplift her race because it was already uplifted. I guess I was so surprised by this because the era in which Hurston was writing was one marked with so much racism. She withstood the oppression and stayed confident in who she was despite everything. “How It Feels to Be Colored Me” shows Hurston’s attitude about her race. She says that she is constantly reminded that she is “the granddaughter of slaves” but this reminder “fails to register depression” within her. When I first read this sentence I couldn’t believe what she was saying. How could she not be angry about all of the years of oppression and inhuman treatment that her people went through? Is she just disregarding all of the horror that her ancestors bore? After reading on, I realized that she is not disregarding it, but has grown from it. She doesn’t see herself as someone bound by her race and is happy “to hold the center of the national stage, with the spectators not knowing whether to laugh or to weep.” Hurston uses the analogy of the start of a race to explain her view on her ancestors. “The terrible struggle that made me an American out of a potential slave said, “On the line!” The Reconstruction said “Get set!”; and the generation before said “Go!” I am off to a flying start and I must not halt in the stretch to look behind and weep.” She says that she has paid through all of her ancestors to get where she is today.
I didn’t understand Hurston’s joke that she uses to begin “How It Feels to Be Colored Me” so I looked up a commentary on it by Cheryl A. Wall of The Scholar and Feminist Online. Hurston’s joke says, “I am colored but I offer nothing in the way of extenuating circumstances except the fact that I am the only Negro in the
At the end of the essay, Hurston compares people to stuffed bags. She says that the bags may be different colors, but the stuffing “might be dumped in a single heap and the bags refilled without altering the content of any greatly.” Simply put, the color of our skin or the color of the bags may be different, but what is inside is similar. “Perhaps that is how the Great Stuffer of Bags filled them in the first place – who knows?”
I think this social vs. genetic distinction is defined very helpfully in your writing here. I definitely got that feeling while reading her writings, but for some reason I never put it in those terms. Thanks for the clarification!
ReplyDeleteYou have a good analysis, Jessa. I also liked Hurston's analogy to explain why she doesn't feel like she has to be bound by the ordeal of her ancestors. It was a new angle that I hadn't fully encountered before.
ReplyDeleteHurston's account in "How it feels" is particularly interesting for this "doubleness" in her identity: me and "colored me." So there's a part of her that isn't black or "just black." Hughes's work, by comparison, seems more focused on blackness.
ReplyDeleteI actually loved the part in the story where she discussed dumping the bags and even though they were all different colors the content was the same. This to me was the perfect way to summarize humans in general. The color of the skin does not change the fact that emotions, thoughts, and actions are in everyone and they are all the same for every individual. This story is one of my favorites that we have read this semester.
ReplyDeleteYour commend at the end of your post ("At the end of the essay, Hurston compares people to stuffed bags. She says that the bags may be different colors, but the stuffing “might be dumped in a single heap and the bags refilled without altering the content of any greatly.” Simply put, the color of our skin or the color of the bags may be different, but what is inside is similar. “Perhaps that is how the Great Stuffer of Bags filled them in the first place – who knows?”") replicated my favorite part in the entire piece. It is such a simple way to word such an utterly powerful concept and issue. The implication in the last line leaves the reader on a playfully philosophical but yet serious note.
ReplyDelete